ASoC: simple-card-utils: fix graph_util_is_ports0() for DT overlays

graph_util_is_ports0() identifies DPCM front-end (ports@0) vs back-end
(ports@1) by calling of_get_child_by_name() to find the first "ports"
child and comparing pointers. This relies on child iteration order
matching DTS source order.

When the DPCM topology comes from a DT overlay, __of_attach_node()
inserts new children at the head of the sibling list, reversing the
order. of_get_child_by_name() then returns ports@1 instead of ports@0,
causing all front-end links to be classified as back-ends. The card
registers with no PCM devices.

Fix this by matching the unit address directly from the node name
instead of relying on sibling order.

Fixes: 9293925245 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: add asoc_graph_is_ports0()")
Signed-off-by: Sen Wang <sen@ti.com>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309042109.2576612-1-sen@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Sen Wang
2026-03-08 23:21:09 -05:00
committed by Mark Brown
parent 634672f9d6
commit 4185b95f8a

View File

@@ -1038,11 +1038,15 @@ int graph_util_is_ports0(struct device_node *np)
else
port = np;
struct device_node *ports __free(device_node) = of_get_parent(port);
struct device_node *top __free(device_node) = of_get_parent(ports);
struct device_node *ports0 __free(device_node) = of_get_child_by_name(top, "ports");
struct device_node *ports __free(device_node) = of_get_parent(port);
const char *at = strchr(kbasename(ports->full_name), '@');
return ports0 == ports;
/*
* Since child iteration order may differ
* between a base DT and DT overlays,
* string match "ports" or "ports@0" in the node name instead.
*/
return !at || !strcmp(at, "@0");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(graph_util_is_ports0);