mirror of
				git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-09-04 20:19:47 +08:00 
			
		
		
		
	 c7e74b3c7b
			
		
	
	
		c7e74b3c7b
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			It should be "low watermark" where we wake up kswapd daemon. Signed-off-by: Liao Pingfang <winndows@163.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1609053319-3112-1-git-send-email-winndows@163.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			224 lines
		
	
	
		
			11 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			224 lines
		
	
	
		
			11 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. _mm_concepts:
 | |
| 
 | |
| =================
 | |
| Concepts overview
 | |
| =================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The memory management in Linux is a complex system that evolved over the
 | |
| years and included more and more functionality to support a variety of
 | |
| systems from MMU-less microcontrollers to supercomputers. The memory
 | |
| management for systems without an MMU is called ``nommu`` and it
 | |
| definitely deserves a dedicated document, which hopefully will be
 | |
| eventually written. Yet, although some of the concepts are the same,
 | |
| here we assume that an MMU is available and a CPU can translate a virtual
 | |
| address to a physical address.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. contents:: :local:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Virtual Memory Primer
 | |
| =====================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The physical memory in a computer system is a limited resource and
 | |
| even for systems that support memory hotplug there is a hard limit on
 | |
| the amount of memory that can be installed. The physical memory is not
 | |
| necessarily contiguous; it might be accessible as a set of distinct
 | |
| address ranges. Besides, different CPU architectures, and even
 | |
| different implementations of the same architecture have different views
 | |
| of how these address ranges are defined.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All this makes dealing directly with physical memory quite complex and
 | |
| to avoid this complexity a concept of virtual memory was developed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The virtual memory abstracts the details of physical memory from the
 | |
| application software, allows to keep only needed information in the
 | |
| physical memory (demand paging) and provides a mechanism for the
 | |
| protection and controlled sharing of data between processes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| With virtual memory, each and every memory access uses a virtual
 | |
| address. When the CPU decodes an instruction that reads (or
 | |
| writes) from (or to) the system memory, it translates the `virtual`
 | |
| address encoded in that instruction to a `physical` address that the
 | |
| memory controller can understand.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The physical system memory is divided into page frames, or pages. The
 | |
| size of each page is architecture specific. Some architectures allow
 | |
| selection of the page size from several supported values; this
 | |
| selection is performed at the kernel build time by setting an
 | |
| appropriate kernel configuration option.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each physical memory page can be mapped as one or more virtual
 | |
| pages. These mappings are described by page tables that allow
 | |
| translation from a virtual address used by programs to the physical
 | |
| memory address. The page tables are organized hierarchically.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The tables at the lowest level of the hierarchy contain physical
 | |
| addresses of actual pages used by the software. The tables at higher
 | |
| levels contain physical addresses of the pages belonging to the lower
 | |
| levels. The pointer to the top level page table resides in a
 | |
| register. When the CPU performs the address translation, it uses this
 | |
| register to access the top level page table. The high bits of the
 | |
| virtual address are used to index an entry in the top level page
 | |
| table. That entry is then used to access the next level in the
 | |
| hierarchy with the next bits of the virtual address as the index to
 | |
| that level page table. The lowest bits in the virtual address define
 | |
| the offset inside the actual page.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Huge Pages
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| The address translation requires several memory accesses and memory
 | |
| accesses are slow relatively to CPU speed. To avoid spending precious
 | |
| processor cycles on the address translation, CPUs maintain a cache of
 | |
| such translations called Translation Lookaside Buffer (or
 | |
| TLB). Usually TLB is pretty scarce resource and applications with
 | |
| large memory working set will experience performance hit because of
 | |
| TLB misses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many modern CPU architectures allow mapping of the memory pages
 | |
| directly by the higher levels in the page table. For instance, on x86,
 | |
| it is possible to map 2M and even 1G pages using entries in the second
 | |
| and the third level page tables. In Linux such pages are called
 | |
| `huge`. Usage of huge pages significantly reduces pressure on TLB,
 | |
| improves TLB hit-rate and thus improves overall system performance.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are two mechanisms in Linux that enable mapping of the physical
 | |
| memory with the huge pages. The first one is `HugeTLB filesystem`, or
 | |
| hugetlbfs. It is a pseudo filesystem that uses RAM as its backing
 | |
| store. For the files created in this filesystem the data resides in
 | |
| the memory and mapped using huge pages. The hugetlbfs is described at
 | |
| :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/hugetlbpage.rst <hugetlbpage>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Another, more recent, mechanism that enables use of the huge pages is
 | |
| called `Transparent HugePages`, or THP. Unlike the hugetlbfs that
 | |
| requires users and/or system administrators to configure what parts of
 | |
| the system memory should and can be mapped by the huge pages, THP
 | |
| manages such mappings transparently to the user and hence the
 | |
| name. See
 | |
| :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst <admin_guide_transhuge>`
 | |
| for more details about THP.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Zones
 | |
| =====
 | |
| 
 | |
| Often hardware poses restrictions on how different physical memory
 | |
| ranges can be accessed. In some cases, devices cannot perform DMA to
 | |
| all the addressable memory. In other cases, the size of the physical
 | |
| memory exceeds the maximal addressable size of virtual memory and
 | |
| special actions are required to access portions of the memory. Linux
 | |
| groups memory pages into `zones` according to their possible
 | |
| usage. For example, ZONE_DMA will contain memory that can be used by
 | |
| devices for DMA, ZONE_HIGHMEM will contain memory that is not
 | |
| permanently mapped into kernel's address space and ZONE_NORMAL will
 | |
| contain normally addressed pages.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The actual layout of the memory zones is hardware dependent as not all
 | |
| architectures define all zones, and requirements for DMA are different
 | |
| for different platforms.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Nodes
 | |
| =====
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many multi-processor machines are NUMA - Non-Uniform Memory Access -
 | |
| systems. In such systems the memory is arranged into banks that have
 | |
| different access latency depending on the "distance" from the
 | |
| processor. Each bank is referred to as a `node` and for each node Linux
 | |
| constructs an independent memory management subsystem. A node has its
 | |
| own set of zones, lists of free and used pages and various statistics
 | |
| counters. You can find more details about NUMA in
 | |
| :ref:`Documentation/vm/numa.rst <numa>` and in
 | |
| :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numa_memory_policy.rst <numa_memory_policy>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Page cache
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| The physical memory is volatile and the common case for getting data
 | |
| into the memory is to read it from files. Whenever a file is read, the
 | |
| data is put into the `page cache` to avoid expensive disk access on
 | |
| the subsequent reads. Similarly, when one writes to a file, the data
 | |
| is placed in the page cache and eventually gets into the backing
 | |
| storage device. The written pages are marked as `dirty` and when Linux
 | |
| decides to reuse them for other purposes, it makes sure to synchronize
 | |
| the file contents on the device with the updated data.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Anonymous Memory
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The `anonymous memory` or `anonymous mappings` represent memory that
 | |
| is not backed by a filesystem. Such mappings are implicitly created
 | |
| for program's stack and heap or by explicit calls to mmap(2) system
 | |
| call. Usually, the anonymous mappings only define virtual memory areas
 | |
| that the program is allowed to access. The read accesses will result
 | |
| in creation of a page table entry that references a special physical
 | |
| page filled with zeroes. When the program performs a write, a regular
 | |
| physical page will be allocated to hold the written data. The page
 | |
| will be marked dirty and if the kernel decides to repurpose it,
 | |
| the dirty page will be swapped out.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Reclaim
 | |
| =======
 | |
| 
 | |
| Throughout the system lifetime, a physical page can be used for storing
 | |
| different types of data. It can be kernel internal data structures,
 | |
| DMA'able buffers for device drivers use, data read from a filesystem,
 | |
| memory allocated by user space processes etc.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Depending on the page usage it is treated differently by the Linux
 | |
| memory management. The pages that can be freed at any time, either
 | |
| because they cache the data available elsewhere, for instance, on a
 | |
| hard disk, or because they can be swapped out, again, to the hard
 | |
| disk, are called `reclaimable`. The most notable categories of the
 | |
| reclaimable pages are page cache and anonymous memory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In most cases, the pages holding internal kernel data and used as DMA
 | |
| buffers cannot be repurposed, and they remain pinned until freed by
 | |
| their user. Such pages are called `unreclaimable`. However, in certain
 | |
| circumstances, even pages occupied with kernel data structures can be
 | |
| reclaimed. For instance, in-memory caches of filesystem metadata can
 | |
| be re-read from the storage device and therefore it is possible to
 | |
| discard them from the main memory when system is under memory
 | |
| pressure.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The process of freeing the reclaimable physical memory pages and
 | |
| repurposing them is called (surprise!) `reclaim`. Linux can reclaim
 | |
| pages either asynchronously or synchronously, depending on the state
 | |
| of the system. When the system is not loaded, most of the memory is free
 | |
| and allocation requests will be satisfied immediately from the free
 | |
| pages supply. As the load increases, the amount of the free pages goes
 | |
| down and when it reaches a certain threshold (low watermark), an
 | |
| allocation request will awaken the ``kswapd`` daemon. It will
 | |
| asynchronously scan memory pages and either just free them if the data
 | |
| they contain is available elsewhere, or evict to the backing storage
 | |
| device (remember those dirty pages?). As memory usage increases even
 | |
| more and reaches another threshold - min watermark - an allocation
 | |
| will trigger `direct reclaim`. In this case allocation is stalled
 | |
| until enough memory pages are reclaimed to satisfy the request.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Compaction
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| As the system runs, tasks allocate and free the memory and it becomes
 | |
| fragmented. Although with virtual memory it is possible to present
 | |
| scattered physical pages as virtually contiguous range, sometimes it is
 | |
| necessary to allocate large physically contiguous memory areas. Such
 | |
| need may arise, for instance, when a device driver requires a large
 | |
| buffer for DMA, or when THP allocates a huge page. Memory `compaction`
 | |
| addresses the fragmentation issue. This mechanism moves occupied pages
 | |
| from the lower part of a memory zone to free pages in the upper part
 | |
| of the zone. When a compaction scan is finished free pages are grouped
 | |
| together at the beginning of the zone and allocations of large
 | |
| physically contiguous areas become possible.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Like reclaim, the compaction may happen asynchronously in the ``kcompactd``
 | |
| daemon or synchronously as a result of a memory allocation request.
 | |
| 
 | |
| OOM killer
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is possible that on a loaded machine memory will be exhausted and the
 | |
| kernel will be unable to reclaim enough memory to continue to operate. In
 | |
| order to save the rest of the system, it invokes the `OOM killer`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The `OOM killer` selects a task to sacrifice for the sake of the overall
 | |
| system health. The selected task is killed in a hope that after it exits
 | |
| enough memory will be freed to continue normal operation.
 |