mirror of
				git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
				synced 2025-09-04 20:19:47 +08:00 
			
		
		
		
	 22714ef854
			
		
	
	
		22714ef854
		
	
	
	
	
		
			
			Use a monospace (literal) formatting for better readability of sysfs attributes. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			265 lines
		
	
	
		
			10 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			265 lines
		
	
	
		
			10 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ==============================
 | |
| How to instantiate I2C devices
 | |
| ==============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unlike PCI or USB devices, I2C devices are not enumerated at the hardware
 | |
| level. Instead, the software must know which devices are connected on each
 | |
| I2C bus segment, and what address these devices are using. For this
 | |
| reason, the kernel code must instantiate I2C devices explicitly. There are
 | |
| several ways to achieve this, depending on the context and requirements.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Method 1: Declare the I2C devices statically
 | |
| --------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This method is appropriate when the I2C bus is a system bus as is the case
 | |
| for many embedded systems. On such systems, each I2C bus has a number which
 | |
| is known in advance. It is thus possible to pre-declare the I2C devices
 | |
| which live on this bus.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This information is provided to the kernel in a different way on different
 | |
| architectures: device tree, ACPI or board files.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When the I2C bus in question is registered, the I2C devices will be
 | |
| instantiated automatically by i2c-core. The devices will be automatically
 | |
| unbound and destroyed when the I2C bus they sit on goes away (if ever).
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Declare the I2C devices via devicetree
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| On platforms using devicetree, the declaration of I2C devices is done in
 | |
| subnodes of the master controller.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	i2c1: i2c@400a0000 {
 | |
| 		/* ... master properties skipped ... */
 | |
| 		clock-frequency = <100000>;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		flash@50 {
 | |
| 			compatible = "atmel,24c256";
 | |
| 			reg = <0x50>;
 | |
| 		};
 | |
| 
 | |
| 		pca9532: gpio@60 {
 | |
| 			compatible = "nxp,pca9532";
 | |
| 			gpio-controller;
 | |
| 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 | |
| 			reg = <0x60>;
 | |
| 		};
 | |
| 	};
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here, two devices are attached to the bus using a speed of 100kHz. For
 | |
| additional properties which might be needed to set up the device, please refer
 | |
| to its devicetree documentation in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Declare the I2C devices via ACPI
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| ACPI can also describe I2C devices. There is special documentation for this
 | |
| which is currently located at :doc:`../firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Declare the I2C devices in board files
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| In many embedded architectures, devicetree has replaced the old hardware
 | |
| description based on board files, but the latter are still used in old
 | |
| code. Instantiating I2C devices via board files is done with an array of
 | |
| struct i2c_board_info which is registered by calling
 | |
| i2c_register_board_info().
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example (from omap2 h4)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   static struct i2c_board_info h4_i2c_board_info[] __initdata = {
 | |
| 	{
 | |
| 		I2C_BOARD_INFO("isp1301_omap", 0x2d),
 | |
| 		.irq		= OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(125),
 | |
| 	},
 | |
| 	{	/* EEPROM on mainboard */
 | |
| 		I2C_BOARD_INFO("24c01", 0x52),
 | |
| 		.platform_data	= &m24c01,
 | |
| 	},
 | |
| 	{	/* EEPROM on cpu card */
 | |
| 		I2C_BOARD_INFO("24c01", 0x57),
 | |
| 		.platform_data	= &m24c01,
 | |
| 	},
 | |
|   };
 | |
| 
 | |
|   static void __init omap_h4_init(void)
 | |
|   {
 | |
| 	(...)
 | |
| 	i2c_register_board_info(1, h4_i2c_board_info,
 | |
| 			ARRAY_SIZE(h4_i2c_board_info));
 | |
| 	(...)
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
| The above code declares 3 devices on I2C bus 1, including their respective
 | |
| addresses and custom data needed by their drivers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Method 2: Instantiate the devices explicitly
 | |
| --------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This method is appropriate when a larger device uses an I2C bus for
 | |
| internal communication. A typical case is TV adapters. These can have a
 | |
| tuner, a video decoder, an audio decoder, etc. usually connected to the
 | |
| main chip by the means of an I2C bus. You won't know the number of the I2C
 | |
| bus in advance, so the method 1 described above can't be used. Instead,
 | |
| you can instantiate your I2C devices explicitly. This is done by filling
 | |
| a struct i2c_board_info and calling i2c_new_client_device().
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example (from the sfe4001 network driver)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   static struct i2c_board_info sfe4001_hwmon_info = {
 | |
| 	I2C_BOARD_INFO("max6647", 0x4e),
 | |
|   };
 | |
| 
 | |
|   int sfe4001_init(struct efx_nic *efx)
 | |
|   {
 | |
| 	(...)
 | |
| 	efx->board_info.hwmon_client =
 | |
| 		i2c_new_client_device(&efx->i2c_adap, &sfe4001_hwmon_info);
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	(...)
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
| The above code instantiates 1 I2C device on the I2C bus which is on the
 | |
| network adapter in question.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A variant of this is when you don't know for sure if an I2C device is
 | |
| present or not (for example for an optional feature which is not present
 | |
| on cheap variants of a board but you have no way to tell them apart), or
 | |
| it may have different addresses from one board to the next (manufacturer
 | |
| changing its design without notice). In this case, you can call
 | |
| i2c_new_scanned_device() instead of i2c_new_client_device().
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example (from the nxp OHCI driver)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = { 0x2c, 0x2d, I2C_CLIENT_END };
 | |
| 
 | |
|   static int usb_hcd_nxp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 | |
|   {
 | |
| 	(...)
 | |
| 	struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap;
 | |
| 	struct i2c_board_info i2c_info;
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	(...)
 | |
| 	i2c_adap = i2c_get_adapter(2);
 | |
| 	memset(&i2c_info, 0, sizeof(struct i2c_board_info));
 | |
| 	strscpy(i2c_info.type, "isp1301_nxp", sizeof(i2c_info.type));
 | |
| 	isp1301_i2c_client = i2c_new_scanned_device(i2c_adap, &i2c_info,
 | |
| 						    normal_i2c, NULL);
 | |
| 	i2c_put_adapter(i2c_adap);
 | |
| 	(...)
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
| The above code instantiates up to 1 I2C device on the I2C bus which is on
 | |
| the OHCI adapter in question. It first tries at address 0x2c, if nothing
 | |
| is found there it tries address 0x2d, and if still nothing is found, it
 | |
| simply gives up.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The driver which instantiated the I2C device is responsible for destroying
 | |
| it on cleanup. This is done by calling i2c_unregister_device() on the
 | |
| pointer that was earlier returned by i2c_new_client_device() or
 | |
| i2c_new_scanned_device().
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Method 3: Probe an I2C bus for certain devices
 | |
| ----------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes you do not have enough information about an I2C device, not even
 | |
| to call i2c_new_scanned_device(). The typical case is hardware monitoring
 | |
| chips on PC mainboards. There are several dozen models, which can live
 | |
| at 25 different addresses. Given the huge number of mainboards out there,
 | |
| it is next to impossible to build an exhaustive list of the hardware
 | |
| monitoring chips being used. Fortunately, most of these chips have
 | |
| manufacturer and device ID registers, so they can be identified by
 | |
| probing.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In that case, I2C devices are neither declared nor instantiated
 | |
| explicitly. Instead, i2c-core will probe for such devices as soon as their
 | |
| drivers are loaded, and if any is found, an I2C device will be
 | |
| instantiated automatically. In order to prevent any misbehavior of this
 | |
| mechanism, the following restrictions apply:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The I2C device driver must implement the detect() method, which
 | |
|   identifies a supported device by reading from arbitrary registers.
 | |
| * Only buses which are likely to have a supported device and agree to be
 | |
|   probed, will be probed. For example this avoids probing for hardware
 | |
|   monitoring chips on a TV adapter.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example:
 | |
| See lm90_driver and lm90_detect() in drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
 | |
| 
 | |
| I2C devices instantiated as a result of such a successful probe will be
 | |
| destroyed automatically when the driver which detected them is removed,
 | |
| or when the underlying I2C bus is itself destroyed, whichever happens
 | |
| first.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Those of you familiar with the I2C subsystem of 2.4 kernels and early 2.6
 | |
| kernels will find out that this method 3 is essentially similar to what
 | |
| was done there. Two significant differences are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Probing is only one way to instantiate I2C devices now, while it was the
 | |
|   only way back then. Where possible, methods 1 and 2 should be preferred.
 | |
|   Method 3 should only be used when there is no other way, as it can have
 | |
|   undesirable side effects.
 | |
| * I2C buses must now explicitly say which I2C driver classes can probe
 | |
|   them (by the means of the class bitfield), while all I2C buses were
 | |
|   probed by default back then. The default is an empty class which means
 | |
|   that no probing happens. The purpose of the class bitfield is to limit
 | |
|   the aforementioned undesirable side effects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once again, method 3 should be avoided wherever possible. Explicit device
 | |
| instantiation (methods 1 and 2) is much preferred for it is safer and
 | |
| faster.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Method 4: Instantiate from user-space
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| In general, the kernel should know which I2C devices are connected and
 | |
| what addresses they live at. However, in certain cases, it does not, so a
 | |
| sysfs interface was added to let the user provide the information. This
 | |
| interface is made of 2 attribute files which are created in every I2C bus
 | |
| directory: ``new_device`` and ``delete_device``. Both files are write
 | |
| only and you must write the right parameters to them in order to properly
 | |
| instantiate, respectively delete, an I2C device.
 | |
| 
 | |
| File ``new_device`` takes 2 parameters: the name of the I2C device (a
 | |
| string) and the address of the I2C device (a number, typically expressed
 | |
| in hexadecimal starting with 0x, but can also be expressed in decimal.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| File ``delete_device`` takes a single parameter: the address of the I2C
 | |
| device. As no two devices can live at the same address on a given I2C
 | |
| segment, the address is sufficient to uniquely identify the device to be
 | |
| deleted.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   # echo eeprom 0x50 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-3/new_device
 | |
| 
 | |
| While this interface should only be used when in-kernel device declaration
 | |
| can't be done, there is a variety of cases where it can be helpful:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The I2C driver usually detects devices (method 3 above) but the bus
 | |
|   segment your device lives on doesn't have the proper class bit set and
 | |
|   thus detection doesn't trigger.
 | |
| * The I2C driver usually detects devices, but your device lives at an
 | |
|   unexpected address.
 | |
| * The I2C driver usually detects devices, but your device is not detected,
 | |
|   either because the detection routine is too strict, or because your
 | |
|   device is not officially supported yet but you know it is compatible.
 | |
| * You are developing a driver on a test board, where you soldered the I2C
 | |
|   device yourself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This interface is a replacement for the force_* module parameters some I2C
 | |
| drivers implement. Being implemented in i2c-core rather than in each
 | |
| device driver individually, it is much more efficient, and also has the
 | |
| advantage that you do not have to reload the driver to change a setting.
 | |
| You can also instantiate the device before the driver is loaded or even
 | |
| available, and you don't need to know what driver the device needs.
 |