The ::avg_load field is a long-standing misnomer: it says it's an
'average load', but in reality it's the momentary sum of the load
of all currently runnable tasks. We'd have to also perform a
division by nr_running (or use time-decay) to arrive at any sort
of average value.
This is clear from comments about the math of fair scheduling:
* \Sum w_i := cfs_rq->avg_load
The sum of all weights is ... the sum of all weights, not
the average of all weights.
To make it doubly confusing, there's also an ::avg_load
in the load-balancing struct sg_lb_stats, which *is* a
true average.
The second part of the field's name is a minor misnomer
as well: it says 'load', and it is indeed a load_weight
structure as it shares code with the load-balancer - but
it's only in an SMP load-balancing context where
load = weight, in the fair scheduling context the primary
purpose is the weighting of different nice levels.
So rename the field to ::sum_weight instead, which makes
the terminology of the EEVDF math match up with our
implementation of it:
* \Sum w_i := cfs_rq->sum_weight
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251201064647.1851919-6-mingo@kernel.org
4ff674fa98