All of these cases are strictly of the form:
preempt_disable();
BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
preempt_enable();
Replace this with bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() which wraps BPF_PROG_RUN()
with:
migrate_disable();
BPF_PROG_RUN(...);
migrate_enable();
On non RT enabled kernels this maps to preempt_disable/enable() and on RT
enabled kernels this solely prevents migration, which is sufficient as
there is no requirement to prevent reentrancy to any BPF program from a
preempting task. The only requirement is that the program stays on the same
CPU.
Therefore, this is a trivially correct transformation.
The seccomp loop does not need protection over the loop. It only needs
protection per BPF filter program
[ tglx: Converted to bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() ]
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200224145643.691493094@linutronix.de
3d9f773cf2