There is currently no return check for writing an authentication
type (HERMES_AUTH_SHARED_KEY or HERMES_AUTH_OPEN). It looks like
it was accidentally skipped.
This patch adds a return check similar to the other checks in
__orinoco_hw_setup_enc() for hermes_write_wordrec().
Detected using the static analysis tool - Svace.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kodanev <aleksei.kodanev@bell-sw.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221227133306.201356-1-aleksei.kodanev@bell-sw.com
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid
intentionally writing across neighboring array fields.
Validate the expected key size and introduce a wrapping structure
to use as the multi-field memcpy() destination so that overflows
can be correctly detected.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210616203952.1248910-1-keescook@chromium.org
ezusb_read_ltv() is always invoked via the ->read_ltv() callback. This
callback is mostly invoked under orinoco_lock() which disables BH.
There are a few invocations during probe which occur in preemptible
context via:
ezusb_probe() -> orinoco_init() -> determine_fw_capabilities()
Extend `hermes_ops' with the ->read_ltv_pr callback which is implemented
with the same callback like ->read_ltv on `hermes_ops_local'.
On `ezusb_ops' ->read_ltv is used for callbacks under the lock which
need to poll.
The new ->read_ltv_pr() is used in the preemptible context in which it
is possible to wait for the completion. Provide HERMES_READ_RECORD_PR()
and hermes_read_wordrec_pr() which behave like their non _pr equivalents
and invoke ->read_ltv_pr().
This removes the last user of ezusb_req_ctx_wait() and can now be
removed.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113212252.2243570-11-bigeasy@linutronix.de
This enum is already perfectly aliased to enum nl80211_band, and
the only reason for it is that we get IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS out of
it. There's no really good reason to not declare the number of
bands in nl80211 though, so do that and remove the cfg80211 one.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
