mirror of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-09-04 20:19:47 +08:00
56a50667cb
5 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
e293f4b1e5 |
perf test: Avoid python leak sanitizer test failures
Leak sanitizer will report memory leaks from python and the leak
sanitizer output causes tests to fail. For example:
```
$ perf test 98 -v
98: perf script tests:
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 1272962
DB test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.046 MB /tmp/perf-test-script.x0EktdCel8/perf.data (8 samples) ]
call_path_table((1, 0, 0, 0)
call_path_table((2, 1, 0, 140339508617447)
call_path_table((3, 2, 2, 0)
call_path_table((4, 3, 3, 0)
call_path_table((5, 4, 4, 0)
call_path_table((6, 5, 5, 0)
call_path_table((7, 6, 6, 0)
call_path_table((8, 7, 7, 0)
call_path_table((9, 8, 8, 0)
call_path_table((10, 9, 9, 0)
call_path_table((11, 10, 10, 0)
call_path_table((12, 11, 11, 0)
call_path_table((13, 12, 1, 0)
sample_table((1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954119000, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
sample_table((2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954137053, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
sample_table((3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954140089, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
sample_table((4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954142376, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 155, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
sample_table((5, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 8, -2058824120, 588306954144045, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2493, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
sample_table((6, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 12, 77, -2046828595, 588306954145722, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 47555, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
call_path_table((14, 9, 14, 0)
call_path_table((15, 14, 15, 0)
call_path_table((16, 15, 0, -1040969624)
call_path_table((17, 16, 16, 0)
call_path_table((18, 17, 17, 0)
call_path_table((19, 18, 18, 0)
call_path_table((20, 19, 19, 0)
call_path_table((21, 20, 13, 0)
sample_table((7, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 13, 46, -2053700898, 588306954157436, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 964078, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 21, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
call_path_table((22, 1, 21, 0)
call_path_table((23, 22, 22, 0)
call_path_table((24, 23, 23, 0)
call_path_table((25, 24, 24, 0)
call_path_table((26, 25, 25, 0)
call_path_table((27, 26, 26, 0)
call_path_table((28, 27, 27, 0)
call_path_table((29, 28, 28, 0)
call_path_table((30, 29, 29, 0)
call_path_table((31, 30, 30, 0)
call_path_table((32, 31, 31, 0)
call_path_table((33, 32, 32, 0)
call_path_table((34, 33, 33, 0)
call_path_table((35, 34, 20, 0)
sample_table((8, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 20, 49, -2046878127, 588306954378624, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2534317, 0, 0, 128933429281, 0, 0, 35, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1))
=================================================================
==1272975==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 13628 byte(s) in 6 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x56354f60c092 in malloc (/tmp/perf/perf+0x29c092)
#1 0x7ff25c7d02e7 in _PyObject_Malloc /build/python3.11/../Objects/obmalloc.c:2003:11
#2 0x7ff25c7d02e7 in _PyObject_Malloc /build/python3.11/../Objects/obmalloc.c:1996:1
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 13628 byte(s) leaked in 6 allocation(s).
--- Cleaning up ---
---- end(-1) ----
98: perf script tests : FAILED!
```
Disable leak sanitizer when running specific perf+python tests to
avoid this. This causes the tests to pass when run with leak
sanitizer.
Reviewed-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
||
|
|
e0c48bf9e8 |
perf scripts python: Add a script to run instances of 'perf script' in parallel
Add a Python script to run a perf script command multiple times in
parallel, using perf script options --cpu and --time so that each job
processes a different chunk of the data.
Extend perf script tests to test also the new script.
The script supports the use of normal 'perf script' options like
--dlfilter and --script, so that the benefit of running parallel jobs
naturally extends to them also. In addition, a command can be provided
(refer --pipe-to option) to pipe standard output to a custom command.
Refer to the script's own help text at the end of the patch for more
details.
The script is useful for Intel PT traces, that can be efficiently
decoded by 'perf script' when split by CPU and/or time ranges. Running
jobs in parallel can decrease the overall decoding time.
Committer testing:
Ian reported that shellcheck found some issues, I installed it as there
are no warnings about it not being available, but when available it
fails the build with:
TEST /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/tests/shell/script.sh.shellcheck_log
CC /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/header.o
In tests/shell/script.sh line 20:
rm -rf "${temp_dir}/"*
^-------------^ SC2115 (warning): Use "${var:?}" to ensure this never expands to /* .
In tests/shell/script.sh line 83:
output1_dir="${temp_dir}/output1"
^---------^ SC2034 (warning): output1_dir appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).
In tests/shell/script.sh line 84:
output2_dir="${temp_dir}/output2"
^---------^ SC2034 (warning): output2_dir appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).
In tests/shell/script.sh line 86:
python3 "${pp}" -o "${output_dir}" --jobs 4 --verbose -- perf script -i "${perf_data}"
^-----------^ SC2154 (warning): output_dir is referenced but not assigned (did you mean 'output1_dir'?).
For more information:
https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2034 -- output1_dir appears unused. Verif...
https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2115 -- Use "${var:?}" to ensure this nev...
https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2154 -- output_dir is referenced but not ...
Did these fixes:
- rm -rf "${temp_dir}/"*
+ rm -rf "${temp_dir:?}/"*
And:
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ test_parallel_perf()
output1_dir="${temp_dir}/output1"
output2_dir="${temp_dir}/output2"
perf record -o "${perf_data}" --sample-cpu uname
- python3 "${pp}" -o "${output_dir}" --jobs 4 --verbose -- perf script -i "${perf_data}"
- python3 "${pp}" -o "${output_dir}" --jobs 4 --verbose --per-cpu -- perf script -i "${perf_data}"
+ python3 "${pp}" -o "${output1_dir}" --jobs 4 --verbose -- perf script -i "${perf_data}"
+ python3 "${pp}" -o "${output2_dir}" --jobs 4 --verbose --per-cpu -- perf script -i "${perf_data}"
After that:
root@number:~# perf test -vv "perf script tests"
97: perf script tests:
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 4084139
DB test
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.032 MB /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/perf.data (7 samples) ]
<SNIP>
DB test [Success]
parallel-perf test
Linux
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.034 MB /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data (7 samples) ]
Starting: perf script --time=,91898.301878499 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --time=91898.301878500,91898.301905999 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --time=91898.301906000,91898.301933499 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --time=91898.301933500, -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --time=91898.301878500,91898.301905999 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --time=91898.301906000,91898.301933499 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 4 jobs: 2 completed, 2 running
Finished: perf script --time=,91898.301878499 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --time=91898.301933500, -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 4 jobs: 4 completed, 0 running
All jobs finished successfully
parallel-perf.py done
Starting: perf script --cpu=0 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=1 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=2 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=3 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=0 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=1 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=2 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=3 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 4 completed, 0 running
Starting: perf script --cpu=4 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=5 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=6 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=7 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=4 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=5 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=6 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=7 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 8 completed, 0 running
Starting: perf script --cpu=8 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=9 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=10 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=11 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=8 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=9 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=10 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=11 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 12 completed, 0 running
Starting: perf script --cpu=12 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=13 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=14 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=15 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=12 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=13 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=14 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=15 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 16 completed, 0 running
Starting: perf script --cpu=16 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=17 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=18 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=19 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=16 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=17 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=18 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=19 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 20 completed, 0 running
Starting: perf script --cpu=20 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=21 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=22 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=23 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=20 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=21 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=22 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=23 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 24 completed, 0 running
Starting: perf script --cpu=24 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=25 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=26 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Starting: perf script --cpu=27 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=25 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=26 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
Finished: perf script --cpu=27 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 27 completed, 1 running
Finished: perf script --cpu=24 -i /tmp/perf-test-script.T4MJDr0L6J/pp-perf.data
There are 28 jobs: 28 completed, 0 running
All jobs finished successfully
parallel-perf.py done
parallel-perf test [Success]
--- Cleaning up ---
---- end(0) ----
97: perf script tests : Ok
root@number:~#
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423133248.10206-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
||
|
|
1c2124ec84 |
perf test shell script: Fix test for python being disabled
"grep -cv" can exit with an error code that causes the "set -e" to abort the script. Switch to using the grep exit code in the if condition to avoid this. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@chromium.org> Cc: Shirisha G <shirisha@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124043015.1388867-5-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> |
||
|
|
2dac1f089a |
perf test: Fix 'perf script' tests on s390
In linux next repo, test case 'perf script tests' fails on s390.
The root case is a command line invocation of 'perf record' with
call-graph information. On s390 only DWARF formatted call-graphs are
supported and only on software events.
Change the command line parameters for s390.
Output before:
# perf test 89
89: perf script tests : FAILED!
#
Output after:
# perf test 89
89: perf script tests : Ok
#
Fixes:
|
||
|
|
bb177a85e8 |
perf tests: Add perf script test
Start a new set of shell tests for testing perf script. The initial contribution is checking that some perf db-export functionality works as reported in this regression by Ben Gainey <ben.gainey@arm.com>: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231207140911.3240408-1-ben.gainey@arm.com/ Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Tested-by: Ben Gainey <ben.gainey@arm.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207174057.1482161-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> |