sfc: fix NULL dereferences in ef100_process_design_param()

Since cited commit, ef100_probe_main() and hence also
 ef100_check_design_params() run before efx->net_dev is created;
 consequently, we cannot netif_set_tso_max_size() or _segs() at this
 point.
Move those netif calls to ef100_probe_netdev(), and also replace
 netif_err within the design params code with pci_err.

Reported-by: Kyungwook Boo <bookyungwook@gmail.com>
Fixes: 98ff4c7c8a ("sfc: Separate netdev probe/remove from PCI probe/remove")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250401225439.2401047-1-edward.cree@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Edward Cree
2025-04-01 23:54:39 +01:00
committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent 15970e1b23
commit 8241ecec1c
2 changed files with 24 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@@ -450,8 +450,9 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
net_dev->hw_enc_features |= efx->type->offload_features;
net_dev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG |
NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_ALL_TSO;
netif_set_tso_max_segs(net_dev,
ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS_DEFAULT);
nic_data = efx->nic_data;
netif_set_tso_max_size(efx->net_dev, nic_data->tso_max_payload_len);
netif_set_tso_max_segs(efx->net_dev, nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs);
rc = efx_ef100_init_datapath_caps(efx);
if (rc < 0)
@@ -477,7 +478,6 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
/* Don't fail init if RSS setup doesn't work. */
efx_mcdi_push_default_indir_table(efx, efx->n_rx_channels);
nic_data = efx->nic_data;
rc = ef100_get_mac_address(efx, net_dev->perm_addr, CLIENT_HANDLE_SELF,
efx->type->is_vf);
if (rc)

View File

@@ -887,8 +887,7 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS:
/* We always put HDR_NUM_SEGS=1 in our TSO descriptors */
if (!reader->value) {
netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
"TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS < 1\n");
pci_err(efx->pci_dev, "TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS < 1\n");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return 0;
@@ -901,32 +900,28 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
*/
if (!reader->value || reader->value > EFX_MIN_DMAQ_SIZE ||
EFX_MIN_DMAQ_SIZE % (u32)reader->value) {
netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
"%s size granularity is %llu, can't guarantee safety\n",
reader->type == ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RXQ_SIZE_GRANULARITY ? "RXQ" : "TXQ",
reader->value);
pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
"%s size granularity is %llu, can't guarantee safety\n",
reader->type == ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RXQ_SIZE_GRANULARITY ? "RXQ" : "TXQ",
reader->value);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN:
nic_data->tso_max_payload_len = min_t(u64, reader->value,
GSO_LEGACY_MAX_SIZE);
netif_set_tso_max_size(efx->net_dev,
nic_data->tso_max_payload_len);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_PAYLOAD_NUM_SEGS:
nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs = min_t(u64, reader->value, 0xffff);
netif_set_tso_max_segs(efx->net_dev,
nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_NUM_FRAMES:
nic_data->tso_max_frames = min_t(u64, reader->value, 0xffff);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_COMPAT:
if (reader->value) {
netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
"DP_COMPAT has unknown bits %#llx, driver not compatible with this hw\n",
reader->value);
pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
"DP_COMPAT has unknown bits %#llx, driver not compatible with this hw\n",
reader->value);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return 0;
@@ -946,10 +941,10 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
* So the value of this shouldn't matter.
*/
if (reader->value != ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_VI_STRIDES_DEFAULT)
netif_dbg(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
"NIC has other than default VI_STRIDES (mask "
"%#llx), early probing might use wrong one\n",
reader->value);
pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev,
"NIC has other than default VI_STRIDES (mask "
"%#llx), early probing might use wrong one\n",
reader->value);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RX_MAX_RUNT:
/* Driver doesn't look at L2_STATUS:LEN_ERR bit, so we don't
@@ -961,9 +956,9 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
/* Host interface says "Drivers should ignore design parameters
* that they do not recognise."
*/
netif_dbg(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
"Ignoring unrecognised design parameter %u\n",
reader->type);
pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev,
"Ignoring unrecognised design parameter %u\n",
reader->type);
return 0;
}
}
@@ -999,13 +994,13 @@ static int ef100_check_design_params(struct efx_nic *efx)
*/
if (reader.state != EF100_TLV_TYPE) {
if (reader.state == EF100_TLV_TYPE_CONT)
netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
"truncated design parameter (incomplete type %u)\n",
reader.type);
pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
"truncated design parameter (incomplete type %u)\n",
reader.type);
else
netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
"truncated design parameter %u\n",
reader.type);
pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
"truncated design parameter %u\n",
reader.type);
rc = -EIO;
}
out: